Welcome to ned Productions (non-commercial personal website, for commercial company see ned Productions Limited). Please choose an item you are interested in on the left hand side, or continue down for Niall’s virtual diary.
Niall’s virtual diary:
Started all the way back in 1998 when there was no word “blog” yet, hence “virtual diary”.
Original content has undergone multiple conversions Microsoft FrontPage => Microsoft Expression Web, legacy HTML tag soup => XHTML, XHTML => Markdown, and with a ‘various codepages’ => UTF-8 conversion for good measure. Some content, especially the older stuff, may not have entirely survived intact.
- A biography of me is here if you want to get a quick overview of who I am
- An archive of prior virtual diary entries are available here
- For a deep, meaningful moment, watch this dialogue (needs a video player), or for something which plays with your perception, check out this picture. Try moving your eyes around - are those circles rotating???
You can find the posts here replicated onto Diaspora, if you prefer to subscribe there instead.
Since then, obviously enough it’s been another total lockdown, can’t travel more than 5km, which is a total arse for entertaining my children at the weekend when I have to find something for us to do not at home. Last weekend I took them up a forested mountain and for a long bike ride (for them). Almost certainly I’ll be doing exactly the same again tomorrow and Sunday, because there is precious little alternative within a 5km radius.
I got my battery load tester from China, so I’ll be able to post empirical testing of those lithium ion AA and AAA batteries I was talking about last post soon. The battery load tester is pretty impressive for €30, sure it’s cobbled together from raw parts, but in terms of capability and UX I came away impressed. I’ll talk about all that when I make my post about those batteries.
As a quick update to #mintos, here are the last two months of earnings:
|Month||Annualised return for each month, total||Non-earning capital||Annualised return for earning capital|
The hit in November was due to me getting out of Mogo, in which I had become 92% invested as I mentioned in my last post, which was causing me concern as according to https://explorep2p.com/mintos-lender-ratings/, Mogo are in trouble. The hit is due to the 0.9% fee Mintos charge for you to sell your holdings, plus for the loans with particularly low interest rate with a 7⁄10 safety rating I had to add a 0.6% discount to get them to shift. Shift them I did though, and I am now merely 31% invested in Mogo, and mostly the higher paying loans at that. I’m comfortable with it being around a quarter of my total.
I mainly swapped out for DelphinGroup, 8⁄10 rating and also highly rated by explorep2p. They had been paying 14% per annum, but just recently they axed that back to 11% or even lower, obviously they feel they no longer need to pay as much for capital. Rather than go back into more Mogo, I decided to diversify into a 7⁄10 rating loan originator, IuteCredit which explorep2p think so highly of. I’m currently at 54% DelphinGroup, 31% Mogo, 15% IuteCredit with loan early paybacks and interest being directed into more IuteCredit, so its relative proportion will keep growing.
Finally, as you’ll note non-earning capital has been rising. This isn’t what it seems, I’ve actually been pulling money out of Mintos altogether, so the proportion locked up due to Capital Service defaulting appears to rise. Mintos supposedly did a repayment deal with Capital Service, in theory they’ll be repaying the whole sum plus interest within three years. All I’ve noticed to date is that what they owe me has actually been slightly increasing from the interest Mintos are adding onto the debt i.e. they don’t appear to be repaying a thing yet, or if they are, it’s less than the interest Mintos are adding. I’d imagine there won’t be progress on this until at least the summer, when in theory we’ll all be vaccinated and Capital Service can start bringing in money again. Assuming they haven’t gone bust before then, of course.
Otherwise all is well here. Work, sleep, childcare, the treadmill keeps turning.
(Speaking of LED bulbs, I recently bought some 1600 lumen Philips LED bulbs, they provide a fabulous, even, illumination for about €3 each. When they are turned on, very impressive how bright the room is)
Anyway what I’ve got for you today are what I think will eventually become the next generation of rechargeable batteries. They have identical form factor to standard batteries so you can stick them in anywhere. Unlike NiMH rechargeables which have a cell voltage of 1.2v (which makes things noticeably dimmer than if you use 1.5v non-rechargeables), these provide a constant 1.5v. By constant, I really do mean constant: they output exactly 1.5v from full until empty, whereupon they then go to 0v. This constant voltage has some big advantages, mainly that things remain bright and never dim over time, like you especially get with any other kind of battery.
The way these batteries work is that they have a lithium ion cell, which like all lithium ion cells outputs about 3v. A very small embedded computer runs a DC-DC voltage converter to downgrade the current voltage (about 3.6v full, down to about 2.5v empty) to 1.5v. This is why the voltage is completely constant until the battery is empty. Essentially, the little embedded computer ‘simulates’ a real AA battery.
Furthermore, because each battery is a small computer, you can recharge them using standard micro USB. The embedded computer takes in the 5v from the USB and charges the lithium ion cell, changing the colour of a little LED from red to green once full. You can only really get these next generation rechargeable batteries in the West from Amazon, where they are sold under the Blackube branding, amongst others. As you will see, they cost about €40 for four AA batteries on Amazon, which is very pricey.
Blackube and all the others are an OEM rebrand of Chinese manufactured batteries. One of the biggest of the original manufacturers is ZNTER, and you can acquire what appear to be the exact same batteries as the vendors on Amazon are selling directly from China for about half the price, if you are willing to wait six weeks or so. Mine arrived last week, and here is what they look like:
The first thing you notice is how light they are, much lighter than alkalines, probably about that of zinc chloride batteries. The second thing you notice is the micro USB slot, which is on the top for the AA batteries, and on the top’s side for the AAA batteries. Other than those two differences, they look every bit exactly like AA or AAA batteries. Plugging them into something, the voltmeter reads a rock steady 1.55v at 200 mA discharge, and 1.53v at 500 mA discharge. Here are the characteristics for the AA size as according to various sources:
|Alkaline non-rechargeable (source)||NiMH rechargeable (source)||ZNTER manufacturer claim (source)||Blackube claim (source)||Blackube measured by lygte (source)|
|Capacity @ 0.1A discharge||2.5Ah||2.0Ah||1.7Ah||1.7Ah||1.65Ah|
|Median voltage @ 0.1A discharge||1.2v||1.27v||1.5v||1.5v||1.5v|
|Power @ 0.1A discharge||3.0Wh||2.5Wh||2.59Wh||2.55Wh||2.47Wh|
|Runtime @ 0.1A discharge||25h||21h||17h (est)||17h (est)||17h|
|Max charge cycles||n/a||1000||3000||1000||n/a|
|Capacity @ 1.0A discharge||1.21Ah||2.0Ah||n/a||n/a||1.59Ah|
|Median voltage @ 1.0A discharge||1.05v||1.25v||n/a||n/a||1.5v|
|Power @ 1.0A discharge||1.3Wh||2.54Wh||n/a||n/a||2.36Wh|
|Runtime @ 1.0A discharge||1.2h||2.0h||n/a||n/a||1.6h|
As usual, you should not trust Chinese manufacturer claims. They are way off reality. Even the Blackube claims are slightly short of measured reality. As you can see, if my ZNTER batteries actually match the Blackube batteries, they are competitive with Alkaline and NiMH at low current draws, though with 20%-33% shorter runtime in exchange for maximum brightness. At higher current draws, these batteries remain competitive with NiMH, and blow away Alkaline batteries which do not cope well with high current draws. They still retain a 20% runtime deficit, but again you get 1.5v throughout.
Now I don’t know if the batteries I bought are in fact identical to the Blackube ones yet. I don’t have the equipment here to test them (the constant voltage confuses all my NiMH assuming equipment), so all I can report right now is anecdotal experience.
Certainly they do work. I have a set in some Christmas lights currently. You’d typically get about five days if you put NiMH into them, but the lights get dull quite quickly. Putting these ZNTER batteries into them they are very bright throughout, but for maybe a little less than three days. One very curious thing is what happens when one of the three batteries in those lights runs out – it ‘vampires’ 0.5v from the remaining two batteries, so 2.5v reaches the lights instead of the expected 3.0v. This means that in practice, the lights are very bright until they go quite dim, as 4.5v drops suddenly to 2.0v. You then don’t know which of the three batteries is empty, so you must recharge all three. Charging does take under two hours, but they draw 0.5A each at the beginning of the charge, not the 0.4A reported by lygte, and definitely not the 0.35A claimed by Blackube. As they approach full, they taper back current heavily, and they never get more than mildly warm around the USB socket (where the IC is).
From this anecdata, I’m thinking that despite the identical outward appearance of these ZNTER batteries to the Blackube ones, they are probably not the same, and not in favour of the ZNTER ones. They did cost half as much, and I definitely don’t think they are half as good, so on that basis I’ve done well.
As I really want to find out the true characteristics of these batteries before I put them into regular use (particularly if they might catch fire under load), I have ordered a cheap programmable load tester from China. Once it arrives I’ll be able to drive a 0.1A and 1.0A load upon them, and see how well they perform.
Until then, I will conclude by saying that these next generation batteries aren’t quite there yet as an Alkaline or NiMH battery killer. But they continue to experience rapid improvement year on year, even just two years ago claimed capacities were considerably less, and as miniaturisation of the components allowing more lithium in the same form factor progresses, that will continue. I would not be surprised if three years from now that this kind of rechargeable battery won’t be superior to NiMH on every metric except price i.e. they will last just as long in runtime at both low and high currents, but output 1.5v throughout, and have thrice longer recharge lifespans. Right now four AA batteries can be got from China for about €13, about double what Amazon charges for their very good NiMH rechargeables. I certainly can see that gap closing to under 50%.
I don’t foresee these batteries ever beating alkaline for long lived low power applications. If you need to power a wall clock for years, expensive alkaline batteries can deliver more than 3.5Wh over five years or more. That cannot be beaten by anything containing an embedded computer which needs to draw some power, no matter how little, never mind the fact that rechargeable chemistry cannot avoid much higher self discharge rates than non-rechargeable. However for applications with very high current draw where even high quality NiMH experiences considerable voltage sag, this kind of rechargeable battery will dominate as lithium ion can deliver vastly more watts than NiMH ever could.
I’ll make another post here with empirical testing of my new batteries when my test equipment arrives. If that doesn’t happen until after Christmas, Merry Christmas!
|Month||Annualised return for each month, total||Non-earning capital||Annualised return for earning capital|
As described in earlier posts, I morally refuse to invest in short term or payday loans, despite that those pay much better interest rates and have much lower risk, so the above returns are for long term, safest possible (>= A or >= 8 rating), subprime debt on Mintos.
As mentioned in my April entry, in March I scalped all the people fleeing Mintos and made an enormous profit. I then used that profit to exchange all my riskier loans for very safe ones backed by assets (mostly Mogo, the Eastern European car lending giant). As everybody was fleeing Mintos at the time, the spread was only a few percent between riskiest and safest, so the loss in April was less than the profit in March. In short, I rebalanced my investments into safety across March-April, and made a slight profit.
Unfortunately, as the column marked ‘Non-earning capital’ would suggest, I was not out of the woods yet. In July one of the loan orginators I had invested in, Capital Service, went bust which was something I had anticipated in my last post. I hadn’t seen that particular loan originator going bust coming, to be honest, they had been relatively highly ranked but what happened was that their customers paid their loan installments in shops weekly when they bought food etc. Normally that’s a great, reliable, revenue stream but thanks to Covid, all that literally vanished overnight. On top of all that, the Polish government gave a loan payment holiday to everybody in the country, and naturally most of the kind of less wealthy client which Capital Service had (i.e. ones who paid their installments in shops, not by standing order from a bank account) took the holiday. Hence, bye bye lender.
About 10% of my investment was tied up in Capital Service, and I hadn’t been able to get out of it because trading their loans had been suspended very early on, though interest payments continued. We had been expecting the Polish government to bail them out, to be honest, as much of the ruling political party’s support are the sort to have loans from Capital Service, so I hadn’t been particularly worried up until suddenly they announced they weren’t going to pay interest on my loans with them any more. So that portion immediately started non-performing which has hurt monthly returns ever since. If you subtract out the non-earning capital, returns are about normal, despite all the covid lockdown disruption and ever rising unemployment rates in Eastern Europe. I expect to get most of the investment in Capital Service back eventually after wind up, but it’ll be many months out, and I won’t get all of it. Still, it could be far, far worse.
Capital Service no longer paying interest was not the cause of the poor July return, however. The hefty dip in July was because of Mogo car loans rebuying almost all the loans I had with them. Mogo had, for a short while right at the start of covid, been selling loans at 16% but no longer was, so I had been hoovering those up on the secondary market when people sold them. Alas, I was paying a small premium to grab them on the basis it would pay out over the many years of holding them, and they were amongst the safest loan originators on Mintos. And, of course, what happened then was that Mogo repaid in full all loans above 12%, which they are allowed to do at any time on Mintos, and indeed this is one of the big ways you can lose money easily on Mintos (their website prints a big warning when you buy loans off others at a premium). Mogo did this because they knew full well that we’d all buy back all those exact same loans at 11.5%, and they’d no longer need to pay out 16%. If I hadn’t paid a premium to buy those loans, I’d not have lost money, I’d just have earned less in the future than I expected. But I had paid those premiums, so I took a hit. Still, this also could have been far, far worse, I lost about three weeks’ earnings.
Up until end of October I had become 92% invested in Mogo. This was a bit uncomfortable, so many eggs in one basket, but there isn’t much choice for high yielding maximum safety loans on Mintos. Then, Mintos changed how they rank riskiness of loan originators to rank each division of Mogo individually and bam!, now a quarter of my Mogo loans are no longer the very safest loan originators. I took that as an opportunity to diversify out, selling my 6 and 7 rated Mogo loans with lower interest rate in favour of 8 rated higher interest rate non-Mogo loans. As everybody else is doing exactly the same, progress is dribs and drabs, but it’s getting there, and I’m in no rush as Mogo has a group guarantee. I expect by the end of this month to become about 50% invested in Mogo, 45% invested in DelfinGroup, and the rest a smattering of risky near-finished legacy loans which ought to get fully repaid due to buyback guarantee before Christmas (one of my scalp strategies was to buy loans with less than a month of term remaining at hefty discounts by fleeing Mintos investors. The vast bulk paid out, earning me around 100-200% annualised, but this long tail is for a few where the borrower extended the loan repayment by a month six times, and six times is the maximum. So in December the loan originator must repay the capital under the buyback guarantee. Even then, I will have easily made over 10% annualised on this long tail).
Periodically reading the blog commentary on all of this https://explorep2p.com/mintos-lender-ratings/ has been interesting. They were once keen on Capital Service, and indeed, if not for face to face covid shutdowns it did look like a good sustainable lending model for reaching less wealthy up-and-coming Eastern Europeans. Lots of people like myself have thus ended up with capital trapped in the Capital Service unwind. Such is life and risk – anybody who had read my guide on Mintos here would know all these is subprime debt, it’s risky.
Interestingly, ExploreP2P’s latest loan originator rankings are similar to Mintos’, except they dislike Mikro Kapital and AgroCredit a lot, whilst Mintos doesn’t care for their favourites luteCredit, Creditstar and Wowwo. As I always did before all this, I choose the common subset of the two rankings, so Placet Group, DelfinGroup and Mogo are the only loan originators with maximum safety ranking on both lists. There I shall stay until the pandemic clears, and hope for the best in the subsequent economic rebound.
You may be reading all of the above and thinking that I did not do well. Yes I did lose a good chunk of my Mintos earnings preceding this, about 4% of capital invested, leaving me with a +8% gain. And I wouldn’t be surprised to lose 10-20% of my Capital Service stake, which would be a further 1-2% of capital invested. +6% return in a year might look rather poor compared to the +12% it could have been.
But you must remember I’m not investing for returns, I am investing to negate inflation on a larger cash pile. On that basis, I am currently almost bang on 1% return, which was almost exactly the average rate of inflation in 2019 in Ireland. Obviously, after income tax on the Mintos earnings, that’s more like 0.5%, so I lost 0.5% of my cash’s purchasing power last year. However, thanks to covid, inflation will be negative in 2020 in Ireland, so as much as covid has hurt my Mintos earnings, there is a corresponding hit to inflation as well. They’ll easily cancel each other out and then some, so I think my 0.5% loss last year should get undone this year.
You should also bear in mind all the calamnities I successfully avoided. I had been heavily invested into ExpressCredit loans from Botswana. I divested completely last year due to getting scared by an ExploreP2P report, in which I lost a bit of income due to inexperience. Had I remained invested in them, I’d have lost everything, as they went down quick and early from covid. I also successfully got myself free of Finko, despite at one time having half my money in them due to me not watching the auto investment bot closely enough. That cost me money to get clear of them, and again, had I not done so I’d have lost half my money since. Lots of loan originators on Mintos went bust, I successfully predicted in advance and avoided almost all of the carnage. I just got caught out by Capital Service because I didn’t expect the Polish government to footgun its financial industry like it did by giving loan repayment holidays to everybody, and then not supporting the lenders. Oh well, you can’t get everything right all the time.
Anyway, I expect more loan originators on Mintos to go bust in the next six months. With a bit of luck, it won’t be Mogo nor DelfinGroup. Thereafter we should economically rebound as lockdowns stop and vaccines start, and I might then start thinking about taking on a bit more risk on Mintos again, especially if Mogo or DelfinGroup repay in full all the higher interest loans they currently are selling in order to drive down their debt costs in a less risky market.
I had never been to the Canary Islands before. They have a reputation of being a tourist trap. I am glad to report that whilst they do have tourist trap bits, if you avoid those, Tenerife is a world class destination experience. Such enormous variety of landscape and terrain on a single island around which you can drive the circumference in under two hours on a very good motorway. You have rainforest, lunar/martian landscapes, volcanic complete with sulphur smell, black sand beaches, cliffs, valleys, plant and animal life, some of the most amazing sights and scenery I’ve ever seen. There is lots of history, old fortifications, naval battles, pirates, old world towns and architecture, many catherdrals, and some very excellent museums. Obviously the food and drink are superb as with anywhere in Spain, and cheaper than in Ireland. And it’s warm, but surprisingly not that humid as the very tall mountain mixes down dry air from high up, so it has probably the best climate of anywhere I’ve ever been – dry without being too dry, warm without being too warm like summers on the Spanish mainland. Something that you really notice compared to Europe is just how pristinely clean everything is at least if you avoid the south – no plastic on the beaches, no pollution which you immediately notice when breathing, and how far across the sea to the other islands you can view. Yet, at the same time, if you want nightlife you have it, if you want your drive-through McDonalds, it’s there. Internet connectivity was generally fabulous, 4G on my phone throughout, and very high performance at that, much better than 4G in Ireland. It has all the comforts of Continental Europe, a much better climate, and a vast choice of stuff to do. I came away from there seriously considering relocating there permanently. That’s how nice it is out there.
Now, in the end, we weren’t there during normal times. We flew out and back on an almost empty plane (which was very pleasant as a result). The English speaking south was desolated, but things were busy enough in the Spanish speaking north where we were as Spanish mainlanders could holiday there without quarantine. The island itself was thus nicely unfull overall, which made it very pleasant to travel around indeed, yet where we were staying all the restaurants and facilities were open and quite busy. I am extremely sure that I would not like it anything like as much during normal non-covid times. Something like twenty-five million people visit per year, and high season is known for the island being absolutely jammers full which does not sound pleasant at all. So our experience was not typical, and permanently relocating there would not be to what we experienced.
And besides, ultimately, it’s a four hour flight from Northern Europe. Getting to and from it is therefore a pain, and not at all guaranteed to remain financially viable in the medium term as climate change gets cracked down upon. Tenerife would be a great place to relocate to if you were young and mobile (assuming you had work doable remotely), or were retired and no longer dependent on needing to find employment if your employment unexpectedly was terminated. As much as living in Northern Europe is much less pleasant, there are very good reasons why all the young with skills and motivation have been migrating from south to north for decades now, with no change in that migration pattern likely soon. The North is where the good jobs are, and it’s where we already live.
After much reseach, I decided on staying for our nine days in Radazul, a commuter town on the southern coast just outside Santa Cruz, the capital. I chose it because if you stay on the northern coast, the climate is far more humid and cloudy, whereas on the southern coast, you get blazing sun and clear skies most of the time. There is thus far less vegetation in the south. The entire of the north of the island is Spanish speaking, and apart from the extreme mountainness, you would swear you were in some part of the Spanish mainland in terms of look and feel. Here is the view from the house we rented:
We looked at that each morning as we drank espresso waking up. It was very pleasant.
One of the earlier things we did was to scale the mountain in the middle of Tenerife, which takes you up 13,000 feet or so. On the way up the terrain completely changes multiple times – forest, shrubs, desert, then actual elemental sulphur emitted recently from the volcano:
Yes, it actually smells like hell up there thanks to the sulphur. The kids seemed most impressed with the stinkiness. And obviously the view from 13,000 feet up is quite something, as is the lack of oxygen which was also a first for the kids. They handled the steep cable car ride well I thought.
On the large plateau on which the mountaintop sits – a mere 8,500 feet or so up – there is some amazing terrain. Here is me walking in it, it wasn’t sand by the way, it was more like a kind of pumice gravel, very odd consistency, indeed it seemed very much like you were on a Martian surface:
Clara was, as you can see, quite taken with the landscape and was attempting to capture it in her notebook.
We went lots of other places with many beautiful sights. Fabulous variety in Tenerife. The only place where we failed to get good photos that I would have wanted to show here was of the rainforest north of Santa Cruz. It is full of laurel trees and this forest has been here since the time of the dinosaurs, indeed this is what dinosaurs thought was typical, and it doesn’t exist worldwide outside a few remote islands any more. If you search Google for images of ‘Anaga Mountains’, you’ll see what we failed to capture. The reason for our failure, incidentally, is that they were closed to walkers when we visited due to fire risk, so we had to just drive through them.
The final place with photos I want to share here was Masca Valley. We very nearly didn’t go here, it was right at the end of our holiday and hadn’t been high on our priority list, partially because it is literally the furthest and most difficult place to get to from Santa Cruz, and partially because it’s a mecca for hikers, and we didn’t think it suitable for the kids. We mainly went there because we thought our visit would be incomplete without going. And boy were we right!
Yeah this place is somewhere very special indeed. The kids, despite their young ages, had been wowed on a number of occasions during the trip. You’d have thought they would have been all wowed out. Then they came here. Stunned silence followed for quite some minutes as they gawped around them attempting to take it all in. The last time I saw them do that was their first visit to Yosemite Valley. Yes, Masca Valley is that impressive.
The town in the centre itself is built up a steep slope. We had lots of fun going down into the town on perilously steep and slippery cobble paths. You can actually see the town stretch along the ridge in the photos to that middle peak, we walked all the way along. The entire town is surrounded by very steep mountains, and the town itself couldn’t be cuter looking, it’s hard to believe it wasn’t intentionally designed to look incredibly pretty (the actual story of why it looks as it does is enormously depressing and mainly due to horrible sustained poverty, discrimination, and Christian missionaries).
Something these pictures completely fail to capture is what is going on over your head in Masca Valley. If you look up, there is this maelstrom twisting and twirling above you, occasionally splattering you with little bits of drizzle. It is the humid air from up north blowing up over the mountain where it collides with the dry, desert air of the south. Clouds carried up the north side evaporate when they hit the south, but they don’t do so instantly. Rather, it is like a flux, a never repeating plasma of vortices shifting and twirling against each other. It is extremely hard to not just gawp at it for twenty minutes in silence, it is completely mesmerising.
On the way out of the valley I attempted to capture that maelstrom from up high. I completely and totally failed, but at least you get the idea:
You can see all that cloud from the north on the right, and the dry clear air from the south on the left.
Finally, Tenerife has an abundance of amazing man made sights as well, including a world class children’s science museum as good as any in San Francisco. Here is a picture of the Black Madonna in her cathedral in Candelaria, and indeed myself and Henry looking at her:
In hindsight we should have taken a lot more pictures of the capital Santa Cruz, which is a lovely old world feel Spanish town, yet also cosmopolitan (we ate very nicely there, despite covid, and extensively wandered by foot its streets). We also should have taken more pictures of Garachico, which is not much changed since the 17th century due to getting partially wiped out by a lava river pouring through it. It had been the capital of the island, the wealthiest part, so it was full of state of the art for its time opulance most of which was left unchanged after the citizens rapidly relocated elsewhere. It is thus chock full of heritage and history, including a monastery and convent still operating since back then unchanged in all these centuries.
You will probably note that I barely mention in any of the above the Tenerife which 95% of those visiting think is Tenerife, which is the southern English speaking part. Don’t get me wrong, we did spend about a quarter of our time there mainly visiting the theme and aqua parks, which are all world class, as good as any in Disneyworld Florida etc. We also stopped off there for an afternoon to wander around, and absolutely can I see the attraction: it is heavily overdeveloped, but that also means everything is within walking distance or taxi ride for the most part, and that means you can spend most of your time there drunk and incapable of driving and that’s not a problem. Waking up in your five thousand room hotel with a hangover is fine when five minutes walk away you are on golden sand beaches (the golden sand is imported so tourists get what they expect, the natural stuff is black, and apart from being very hot in the sun it’s very much superior to golden sand). When we were there it only had English old people in it, they still kept the bars busy, mostly whinging about Brexit and the NHS. They were friendly, but very much the kind of English who annoy everybody else in Europe. If it were running at full tilt, I suspect it would be lots and lots more of the same, only a bit younger, and with lots more children as Tenerife is the most favoured destination for those with younger families.
For a cheap holiday break away, you can get a room in those five thousand room hotels for maybe €200/week, flights might be another €200, spending money maybe €500 and you’ll be done for under a grand. Try achieving the same with a week in Killarney, for example, despite that you don’t need to fly there. Last time I tried I spent two grand, because Ireland is very unreasonably priced compared to Tenerife south. That’s why so many Irish flock to the Canary Islands instead of holidaying locally, Irish tourist destinations are geared for richer folk than the Irish .
Now, I did spent a lot more than two grand on our nine days in Tenerife. The house, which was twice the size of our own in Ireland, took a good chunk of it. As did all the activities out each day. All in all, excluding flights, it was similarly priced to our Christmas in California year before last, so our rate of ‘cash burn’ was quite similar, though we did do more expensive activities per day in Tenerife than we did in California, during which many days were spent scouting out our wedding, and thus were mainly driving and not spending money. Obviously, both were well under half the cost of our two weeks in Disneyworld Florida nearly three years ago, which was hideously expensive, but also unforgettable.
It’s now 2.25am, and I’m very tired so I’ll stop for now. Next few days I want to write another post updating where things are at with my Mintos peer-to-peer lending investments, as I just recently shifted allocation once again due to new news. See you then!
This is certainly not the first time that nedprod.com has suffered outage. In the approx ~22 years that this website has been here, there have been multiple uptime calamnities, some my fault, some bad luck, and some malfeasance of the website hosting provider. However, this is the first time that I’ve experienced a catastrophic hardware failure on a rented server – it was working fine, I rebooted it for the first time in 485 days, it never restarted. All data on that server was lost.
This partially explains how long it took me to restore this website: whilst all irreplaceable data such as email was safely backed up, and none of that was lost, I did lose all my replaceable data, where ‘replaceable’ is defined as ‘all the stuff repeatable using Niall’s extremely limited free time’, which back when I first took that decision of not backing up everything to home, assumed pre-children free time availability levels.
Which brings me to the point of this post: irreplaceable data is obviously the most important data of all. My automated backups worked a treat on those. But I hadn’t really considered deeply, until now, just how many hours of my time had been invested into my public server. As a conservative estimate, it’s many hundreds of hours. Normally, when I transition server providers, I take a complete copy of the preceding server onto the new server. Then all the custom scripting and tweaks etc from the preceding servers are all never lost. But when you lose the whole server, all that accumulated investment gets lost. I know a lot of this stuff is trivial, like I had written a small Python script to grok the RTE Pulse page for the current show title, and use that to tell the streamripper doing the recording what the name of the current show is. Thus I can constantly record RTE Pulse, and play back specific shows at work. As much as I could rewrite that in a few hours, it is a few hours of my time to debug the thing. And my non-sleep non-work non-childcare hours are an exceptionally scarce resource. It is extremely likely that much of this lost infrastructure, I won’t be restoring, because most of it was a convenience rather than a necessity – taking RTE Pulse again as an example, I know the shows I like the most, and they all are on mixcloud, so I can just manually go there for each of them.
Anyway, obviously enough I have taken measures to prevent this ever happening again. This website is now being served from a €5/month dual core Intel Atom C2338 @ 1.74Ghz dedicated server with 4Gb RAM and a 128Gb SATA SSD. It is very severely underpowered, it runs at a fraction of the speed of my preceding eight core Intel Atom C2750 dedicated server for €11/month. But here’s the key thing: I now have two of those servers, so for the same money, I get failover redundancy, albeit with far less CPU grunt (half the total CPU cores running at two thirds the clock speed). Because these little servers are so underpowered, and I am making them run ZFS on root because I am a mean person, I’ve had to disable PHP processing entirely – this is now back to being a 100% static website, just like it was in the 1990s . You readers probably won’t notice the difference – the only missing bit is the visitor counter at the top, which used a bit of PHP and a SQLite database (also lost). I do feel that loss a bit, I had visitor counts per page since the 1990s. But given that nobody since the 1990s bothers with that any more, I doubt the loss will be noticed.
Even with this now being a pure static website, ZFS is so much work for these tiny Atom CPUs that storage bandwidth is quite impacted. For incompressible data:
- Raw 128Gb SATA SSD: ~470Mb/sec read, 340Mb/sec write (it’s a Sandisk X400 SSD, a four year old TLC design).
- Unencrypted LZ4 compressed: 348Mb/sec read, 244Mb/sec write (approx -35% over raw, but usually most data compresses well, in which case this compression yields a net gain).
This in turn badly hurts the 1Gbps NIC, as served by nginx, tested from a nearby server:
- Raw network can achieve ~100Mb/sec i.e. RAM to RAM via nginx.
- Cached file content @ 80Mb/sec @28%user 37%system 34%idle (approx -20% over raw).
- Uncached file content requiring i/o and LZ4 decompression @ 59Mb/sec: 22%user 41%system 37%idle (approx -41% over raw).
During that last benchmark, one of the two Atom CPUs is maxed out, the other is fairly idle, so basically the NIC is being throttled by the lack of single core compute available. In the end though, three fifths of a gigabit is probably enough for most people only wanting to pay ~€5/month. And, because we shall be load balancing web requests across both servers, that’s twelve tenths of a single gigabit server i.e. +20% more available bandwidth, for the same money.
Anyway, time for bed methinks. I hope y’all are doing well, and you weren’t worried by here disappearing!
For the record, both the HTC 10 and Galaxy S7 phones have been great choices. As models abandoned by their manufacturers for software updates due to being end of life, both ran LineageOS from the beginning, mine with MicroG replacing Google Services, hers with standard Google services. There are minor design failings in each, no doubt (the HTC 10’s display is its weakest feature relatively speaking; the S7’s camera is its weakest feature), but both phones are small yet with QHD displays, and nobody makes phones both physically small and with high definition displays any more .
Normally speaking, I would have gone for the Galaxy S9, which as it’s no longer in production, is end of life and which you can buy as new but from clearance stock from eBay right now for under €300 delivered. It’s a great phone for that money, it has official LineageOS support so it’ll be trouble free, and it’s almost exactly the same width as the HTC 10 or S7, just slightly taller. It’s overwhelmingly the rational choice if you want a high end phone for great money which has a first class LineageOS experience. Anyone sensible should buy that phone as a very reasonably priced high end LineageOS phone.
And of course I, not being rational, didn’t do that. I went for the Galaxy S10 instead, currently available new on eBay for under €500 delivered thanks to the recent price cuts due to the S20 release. Is the S10 66% better than the S9? Absolutely not: sure, the S10 has twice the RAM, twice the storage, twice the number of cameras, +33% more CPU grunt, +66% more graphics grunt, fancy in-display fingerprint reader, an even better HDR+ display than the S9, and much louder speakers than the S9. But its LineageOS support is still a work in progress, and the ‘decent cases’ story is really terrible for the S10, which doesn’t seem to have anything like the cases choice that the S10e, S10+ or S10 lite have.
Nevertheless, I still chose the S10 over the S9 for three reasons: (i) I like to listen to the radio when in the shower, and the HTC 10 just isn’t quite loud enough, and the S9 is about the same loudness as the HTC 10 (ii) I have a sneaking suspicion that older batteries, even if unused, don’t last quite as long as newer unused batteries (iii) I don’t take many photos, but when I do I take panoramas. The dedicated wide field panorama lens therefore appealed to me.
All that said, if I were you, I’d choose the S9, unless you like installing quirky LineageOS betas. Don’t get me wrong, three months from now the S10’s firmware story will likely be far better. Almost without doubt, the most rational high end LineageOS phone to buy next year will be the S10, and that was also a factor in choosing the S10 over the S9.
Comparing the HTC 10 to the Samsung Galaxy S10
I’m about to do something really unfair, and review both phones comparing them against one another. The HTC 10 went on sale in April 2016, whereas the S10 went on sale March 2019. Three years separate these former flagships from both companies. Is there any doubt which will win?
My HTC 10 runs LineageOS Android 9, whereas the Galaxy S10 runs LineageOS Android 10. What few differences between those two Android versions there are I have so far found meaningless. Result: Draw.
My HTC 10 is plenty swift for most things. The Camera app is slow, but that’s because I’m running a hacked Pixel 3 camera on it, which works just fine on my older Qualcomm DSP, just at a fraction of the speed of the Pixel 3’s Qualcomm DSP. Can’t say I care though, it takes pictures just fine, just with a bit of lag. And said pictures are very, very good (as we shall see later). But for general day to day use, it’s very rare I could find myself frustrated with the HTC 10’s speed. Its Snapdragon 820 didn’t have the heat nor throttling problems of immediately preceding Qualcomm CPUs. Anything I ever tried with it, including games and VR, ran absolutely fine.
Now, as much as I just said that the HTC 10 always felt fast, it wasn’t until I used the S10 did I realise just how much snappier the UI could be. Per-core, the S10 is about 70% faster, and it is very noticeable when using the phone. Result: S10 win.
Yeah this isn’t even a contest. The HTC 10 has what was even in its generation only a rather good Sharp IPS LCD panel. Not terrible by any means, but not class leading at the time: Megan’s S7 AMOLED panel easily beat it back then, even with its uneven coloration and blow out of blues. The S10 meanwhile, well I’ll straight out say that it’s the finest display that I have ever seen or used, on any device ever including pro workstation displays. Unlike earlier AMOLED displays, the HTC 10’s is ridiculously accurate (no blowouts or colour hues overdone), whilst simultaneously having this really deep richness and gamut. Colour is somehow simultaneously understated AND detailed and fine. My 2019 Dell XPS 13 laptop has a fine HDR 4k panel with 80% DCI-P3 gamut, but comparing the same photos side by side on both displays the S10’s display (113% DCI-P3!) just blows that right out of the water. No comparison: the S10 has the best display ever seen in mass production, period. Result: S10 win
I haven’t tested headphones yet on the S10, though the HTC 10’s headphone DAC would be very hard to beat: it can drive very high current headphones with ease, and is widely regarded as one of the best headphone drivers ever made. On speakers which I have tested across multiple days, the S10’s stereo speakers can reach far louder volumes than the HTC 10’s stereo speakers, I will without doubt be able to listen to radio in the shower. Neither phone distorts audio at maximum volume.
But do you know something? The S10’s speakers are tinny. Perfectly clear, but there is absolutely no bass. Whereas in the HTC 10, the bottom speaker is a ‘bass’ speaker, in so far as such a thing is possible in such a small space. But do you know, it makes all the difference. Radio from the HTC 10 is much richer, fuller, pleasant sounding. Male voices in particular sound much better. The HTC 10’s speakers are as crap as the S10’s for music however, only on radio are they clearly superior. Sorry Samsung, I know the S9 was far, far better than preceding phones for the speakers (the S7’s single speaker is awful), but the S10 still falls far short of the HTC 10. Result: HTC 10 win
Perhaps surprisingly both phones have almost identical main camera units: both 12MP, both almost identical field of view, both optical image stabilised. I took some photos earlier today from my office, and I’ve got to be honest, there is very little between them in bright sunshine, even zooming into the pictures real close. When the HTC 10 launched, it was lauded for its camera which was much lower resolution than the competition at the time, but its much larger sensor pixels gave far superior low light performance. Samsung copied the idea for the S9, which had only a 8MP camera, and thus after a few incremental evolutions weirdly the S10 ended up exactly where the HTC 10 was at three years ago. And taking a picture just there in the almost-dark, both cameras still perform about the same – maybe, just maybe, the S10 is marginally better despite its smaller sensor pixels, but it does have a larger aperture to let in more light. Result: Draw.
Let me be very clear here: the S10’s camera absolutely blows away the S7’s camera. Megan and I often noted just how shit the S7’s camera was compared to my HTC 10’s, with her even going so far as to deliberately use my phone if the photos were important. That’s just how good the HTC 10’s camera was, and at least now we know the S10’s camera is no worse.
I should also mention that the S10 is using OpenCamera, which uses the generic AOSP Camera2 API, whereas the HTC 10 is using a hacked Pixel 3 camera, which is Qualcomm and Google proprietary and consistently wins the annual camera phone reviews. So the comparison isn’t entirely fair.
Fingerprint reader and buttons
The S10 has a fancy ultrasonic fingerprint reader built into the screen, whereas the HTC 10’s is an ugly slatted thing in the hefty bezel below the display. I’ve got to be honest, both work well. The S10’s had a reputation for being laggy, but perhaps that was early firmwares, I’ve found it not noticeable. Its usable surface area is a little small though, and it’s not entirely obvious where to exactly put your finger always. Whereas the HTC 10’s fingerprint reader ‘just works’, and doubles as a ‘home button’ in addition to the other two hardware buttons next to it for back and switch apps. I know it’s ‘not cool’ to diss bezel-less phones, and yes the S10 has a screen reaching almost entirely from the top to the bottom of the phone. But most of my time is spent clicking and moving around apps rather than watching content (and for which the HTC 10’s aspect ratio is just fine for typical widescreen content in any case), and I hate to say it, but everything is just a touch more fluid in that department on the HTC 10 than on the S10 which has the screen do everything.
And oh, there is one other major difference: the HTC 10 has its volume button on the right, so it’s available for use with a folio case closed. The S10, for no good reason, has the volume button on the left, hidden beneath the hinge of your case, so you have to open the case to change the volume. Which sucks. Between both of those differences: Result: HTC 10 win
Holding both phones in your hand, naked, they are surprisingly similar. I know that earlier I said that the S10 is taller, and it is, but really there is barely anything in it: the case you choose would make more difference. They are almost identical width, the S10 very marginally less so. The S10 is noticeably thinner, but the HTC 10 is all aluminium and doesn’t feel as plasticky. They feel about the same weight, both with more weight towards the bottom to aid balance, and the HTC 10 having more mass towards its centre, whereas the S10 has more mass around its edges. I know nobody uses their phones naked, they always have a case on, so to be honest I’m calling them so close that the case makes the difference. Result: Draw
I think that coming from the S7, Megan will find the S10 pretty much better in every single area. I think that she’ll be very pleased with the upgrade, because on every individual measure, the S10 is better than the S7, and as it ought to be coming from Samsung.
Coming from the HTC 10, the picture is more mixed, as you’ll notice by the draw in the results above. I really wish the speakers produced better quality sound whilst still being louder: my Dad’s high end iPhone just blows all our phones out of the water for speaker quality, and I don’t understand why Samsung can’t achieve the same in their flagships. I would strongly prefer the button layout of the HTC 10, I have no idea why Samsung chose the left side for the volume button.
So I’m giving up more than Megan will be, particularly on audio. I therefore think I’ll miss my HTC 10 in some aspects, despite the three years of evolutionary distance. I remember feeling a similar loss when I transitioned from my Huawei Nexus 6P which was another great phone. I summarised my thoughts about leaving it for the HTC 10 at the time. Preceding the 6P was the Nexus 5 which I still have, and unlike all my other preceding phones, is still working well. Maybe due to being manufactured by LG? Still, whilst a good phone, the Nexus 5 wasn’t a great phone like the 6P and HTC 10 were. I’d even throw the Nexus 4 into the ‘great phone’ category, I only used it a bit because it was Megan’s phone, but it was showstoppingly good in its day, and I remember it remained competitive in terms of CPU and display even years after she got it. And all those phones were far better than the original Samsung Galaxy Nexus which was very expensive at the time and not very good, except for its early AMOLED display and its outstanding build quality which puts even the S10 to shame even today.
Going forth, given that you can’t get clearance unused Pixel phones at sufficient discount, I can see Samsung Galaxy or Xiaomi devices being the only high end LineageOS choice from now on, with a possible surprise dark horse for OnePlus devices. HTC have pretty much given up on making great phones. Huawei don’t seem to provide bootloader unlocking for recent devices, nor do whatever the company is making those very nice Nokia branded devices nowadays. Sony as always are all over the place, and the uncertainty means very patchy LineageOS maintainers. OnePlus’s recent devices look competitive, but like Google they don’t currently dump to eBay heavily discounted clearance stock of unused devices, so they aren’t price competitive for older devices with similar spec to Samsung or Xiaomi. Xiaomi devices currently trail in specs to Samsung devices, and they tend to not do 1440p displays, and even then the displays they use are much inferior to Samsung’s. But I can easily see them catching up next few years. Shame actually that Huawei don’t allow bootloader unlocking, as their devices are good competitors for Samsung’s right now. But, equally, they’re no cheaper for the same spec to Samsung at dump prices, and Samsung devices do always reliably draw in lots of LineageOS maintainers. So I can see myself and Megan going to the Galaxy S30 next, then the Galaxy S50, and so on. A one trick pony, but I’m very sure that Samsung will ensure they remain competitive going forth.
Last year we had a worldwide glut of flash memory, which led to unusually keenly priced SSDs, as can be seen from the graph above. It would seem that Intel adjust Optane X-Point to match SSD pricing, as this year they have increased pricing by exactly the percentage that SSDs have risen, which is surely no coincidence. This, in turn, has led to the logistic model regression curve for X-Point to gain quite an unusual predicted incline, but those there are the stats given current data. In any case, SSDs are expected to not become any cheaper next year, in order to remain upon their predicted curve.
Hard drives have come out as predicted, however. And SSDs remain predicted to eventually match magnetic hard drives, though many decades from now.
This led to rather stonking returns for March:
|Month||Annualised return for each month|
That annualised return in March is quite usurious, obviously enough. And I felt slightly bad about it at the time. However, earlier this month I noticed that the discount for the very risky loan originators had dropped to about 8-12%, whilst the very safest loan originators was 5%. I thus sold all my loans in the risky loan originators, and replaced them with loans in the very safest loan originators. Paying for the ~5% difference in spread cost me most of my outsize gains in March, but I felt it worth it at the time: most of the riskier loan originators were having cash flow problems and had fallen behind, or stopped completely, paying what was owed for loans with them. I could see that a sixty day delinquent loan buyback guarantee from such loan originators would not be worth much. By completely exiting those riskier loan originators, even though it was expensive, I made a prudent move.
I then doubled down on buying dud second hand loans from the very safest loan originators which were within a month of being bought back under the buyback guarantee, which were trading at a 5% discount. The math went like this: within an average of 15 days, the loan originator would buy back the loan, and I’d pocket 5% from having bought them at a discount. That makes an upper bound of 322% annual return, though it would be lower than that due to some borrowers restoring their loan to health etc. I sat back, expecting to make a mint.
However, I actually began to bleed money! Not quickly, but little by little, I was losing money. When I dropped below my balance end of February i.e. I was now down a whole month of normal gains, I suspended the automatic investment bots, and began to dig into what was going on.
The very safest loan originators, which I hadn’t really invested in before until now due to their low interest rates, it turned out had very different borrower behaviour to what I had been expecting. The difference is that all their loans are collateralised with something important to the borrower, which for my strategy was mostly their primary car. It turns out, unsurprisingly, that people really don’t want their car to be repossessed, and they’ll keep paying at least part of the car loan. That meant that most of these loans which I had bought never reached buyback, and when they went healthy again I was selling them at a 6% discount as that is the going rate for loans not nearing buyback. I was thus buying at 5% discount, selling at 6% discount, plus another 0.85% to Mintos as a transaction fee. I was thus losing, on average, approximately 1.5% per loan bought!
The temptation at this point was to simply sink everything into new loans with five year terms currently paying 16% per year, and draw a line under the whole experience. But then it occurred to me: people really don’t want their car to be repossessed. And when would they least want their car repossessed? Why, at the very final payment of the loan of course, when you’ve been paying for the thing for five or more years, and you’ve just one final payment to make and you’re free of the loan, and you get to keep your car.
So I flipped the strategy on its head, literally the inverse from before: now buy second hand collateralised loans with the very safest loan originators whose remaining term is less than a month, and whose yield before maturity including discounts from the seller exiting Mintos exceeds 11%. That gives a best case return of 349% annualised, though it will be likely a good bit lower due to some not paying off the car loan, and then the buyback guarantee returns only the sum invested.
It’s too early to say how this new strategy will fare. It’s also the case that half my portfolio is under the previous strategy, so even more losses beckon yet. At some point Mintos investors will stop fleeing the platform taking haircuts to do so, and this whole game will end. Hopefully those five year term loans with the very safest loan originators paying 16% per annum will still be available, so I can lock in excellent returns for the next five years. We shall see!
I don’t want to beat the dead horse much further, but I do want to close this post reminding readers that this is a risky investment. If a mutual fund on the stock market returned 16% per annum during a bull market, it achieves that because it is also able to lose 16% per annum during a bear market.
This variant of p2p lending that I have described has only upside, in normal times. Your money can only rise, or not rise, but never fall. But for this to work, during an economic downturn that means someone, somewhere, must foot the bill for rising bad debt. When their reserves exhaust, they’ll go bankrupt, and thus exhaust the reserves of their creditors, causing more bankruptcies, and so on. That’s what economic downturns do.
So be very careful here. Bankruptcy happens slowly, and then suddenly. Loan originators will look strong, and then suddenly go bang. So long as the ~16% returns will be more than the amount that you will lose when an originator goes bust, stick with Mintos. As soon as you believe that this may no longer be so, time to get out, and remember lots of other Mintos investors will be doing exactly the same i.e. there will be a run on Mintos, people will have to sell their loans with large discounts in order to shift them quickly.
That run on Mintos I predicted back then began earlier this week. I first noticed it around Wednesday (today is Sunday), which was a few days later than I should have, given hindsight. But I was busy at work and childcare and of course dealing with Covid virus quarantine etc etc etc and not really thinking about that we are entering the worst economic collapse since the Second World War. Yes, even worse than the previous worst economic collapse back in 2009, and a whole ton of people aren’t going to be able to make the payments on their loans now. Some of which will be resume payments after a few months, but another chunk of which will be defaulting with the whole loan lost. So of course investors are going to stampede for the exit door in all things investment related because (a) they need cash urgently, given their own loss of income and (b) panic.
Since Wednesday, it’s become so much fun. I’ve watched the discount rate on the Mintos secondary market (the amount people discount the loans they are selling in order to shift them) climb from 8% on Friday to 25% today. Yes, that’s right, people are taking a haircut of one quarter of their money to get it out now.
It gets even better again: people are selling dud loans i.e. ones within 30 days of having the capital repaid by the loan originator due to the buyback guarantee on dud loans for a 18% discount. Annualising that, that’s a > 700% return on your money if you buy up those loans and the loan originator does indeed buy them back at par within 30 days. That’s firesale pricing, people are so desperate to get out that they aren’t acting rationally.
Unless, of course, the loan originators don’t pay out on the buyback guarantee. And they’re going to see a very severe cash flow crunch in the next few weeks as most loans go late, and perhaps half eventually go bad.
I stopped the investment bots investing in any new loans earlier this week. Up until then, I saw the following monthly returns:
|Month||Annualised return for each month|
So there had been a bit of a drop off in returns since November, mainly due to me diversifying my loan originators considerably to spread out risk, and I’m nicely split on a 2.8:1.8:1.4:1.3 ratio between my top four, all of which are mostly in Eastern Europe and thus within the EU (and thus, hopefully, highly likely to get EU financial bailout money). The reason, incidentally, that I did that was because the growth of the “Loans Funded” graph at https://www.mintos.com/en/statistics/ went from exponential to linear growth in September 2019, and by November it looked to me that we’d reached a point of inflection on a logistic growth model. That’s clearly not going to happen now, that graph is obviously going to collapse next. Nobody wants to lend out new money in the worst recession since the Second World War.
After thinking about it this weekend, and weighing up factors and sticking my finger in the air, I’ve decided to take a punt on scalping the panic exiters. I’ve set up a single investment bot which will buy any dud loan with buyback guarantees within 30 days of buy back being sold on the secondary market from one of the A-rated loan originators also at the very top of the rankings at https://explorep2p.com/mintos-lender-ratings/ with a > 12.5% discount. That’s a mere ~400% annualised return rather than 700%, but given the large relative size of those loan originators in their home markets, I think it reasonably likely they’ll get bailed out by their governments all of whom are in the EU and can tap limitless ECB funding. That’s my bet, and we shall see how it pans out.
Though I know it will seem usurious to you readers to take advantage of fleeing Mintos investors in such a fashion, equally if I didn’t buy them out, they’d not be able to sell at all. Also, I’m fully and entirely expecting at least one of my loan originators to blow up, potentially locking up a quarter of my total investment for the twelve or eighteen months it’ll take to conclude bankruptcy proceedings, after which I should get back more than half of my investment. If my bet pays off, most of the losses on that now sunk investment (I cannot unwind any of my loan investments without taking a hefty haircut) ought to be made up from those usurious profits. If my bet doesn’t pay off, then it’s a lose-lose-lose across the board.
And that’s okay. I went in with my eyes open and fully understanding the risks involved. However, I’d like to close this post with asking readers to spare a thought for all those former Mintos investors currently losing a quarter of their investment, which is about two years of earnings on Mintos. As much as that’s the game we’re all playing here, that’s still real people losing real money with real effects upon real families. Food for thought!
Meanwhile, the other parent was at home, furiously working away: Megan was studying for her Accounting exams, me I spent the Christmas break generating these WG21 papers:
- P1028R3 SG14
- P1029R3 move
- P2052R0 Making modern C++ i/o a consistent API experience from bottom to top
- P2069R0 Stackable, thread local, signal guards
The R0 papers took the most work obviously, as R1 and later incorporate WG21 meeting feedback, and are just revisions of R0 papers. Most of my Christmas, indeed far more of my Christmas than I had expected, went on P2052R0 because the damn prototype took so long to make work competitively. This isn’t to say that I wasn’t fully invested in the Christmas holidays – whenever there was active family stuff, I did that. It was just that during passive family stuff like watching movies, I was banging away on the laptop.
Since Christmas holidays ended, it was back to the day job, apart from taking four days for a very brief honeymoon in Granada in Spain. This was the longest that we could organise childcare for, and my sister and her husband looked most exhausted when we returned, they not being used to childcare for more than a day. Granada was pleasant, quite touristy, but that’s no bad thing in mature Western Europe where gaudy bling tourism died out some years ago. It was all very refined, very Western European, similar prices to Ireland, reminded you a lot of California except vastly more ancient in terms of human artifacts. We passed by the Nerja Caves on the way home, humans have been busy painting in those for about forty-two thousand years or so, and the history of that region has been fairly unbroken since: you will find in abundance scattered remains from the Phoenicians, Romans, Moors and onwards. As much as Ireland contains lots of ancient stuff, a lot more of the very ancient and more recent ancient stuff remains in southern Spain and northern Africa – I suppose unsurprisingly, as said empires and civilisations only ever grazed Ireland, and there was only a comparatively small window between those and the retreat of the ice glaciers, unlike in southern Spain where it has always been warm and fertile since the beginning of humans as a species.
Looking forwards from now, I shall be attending the WG21 meeting in Prague in February, and I expect little other excitement before Easter, when we shall be in Belgium for a long weekend. Be happy!